International Law versus
Facts on the Ground
‘Profiting from the Occupation’ was the
title of a conference held on 9 July, organised by the charity War on Want. The
aim was to highlight firms that support the Israeli Occupation of Palestine. As
readers will know, by 9 July
Since then we have seen the bombing of
Speakers at the conference stressed the
continued attack on
The conference looked at house demolitions
and Caterpillar - the firm that supplies bulldozers used to demolish
Palestinian homes. Perhaps Caterpillar might argue that it can’t be held
responsible for the use the Israelis make of its vehicles? Not really because
the bulldozers, which are supplied direct to the Israeli Defence Force, are
armoured and specially modified for use in
The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions has calculated that some 12,000 Palestinian homes have been demolished since 1967. Over 70,000 people have seen their houses destroyed while many more have had farms, orchards and olive groves razed to the ground.
Bulldozers supplied by Caterpillar, Daewoo
and Volvo are also used in the construction of
Caterpillar is one of the firms being
targeted as part of a major campaign with for example pressure being put on church
organisations in the USA and UK to stop investing in the firm. Another company
to be targeted is Connex for building the light rail system which is a vital
component of plans for the annexation of Palestinian East
The term ‘Disinvestment’ will remind people of the Anti-Apartheid campaign. Jeff Halper a Jewish professor and founder of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions argues that Israeli policy backed up by ‘facts on the ground’ are leading inevitably to a new Apartheid regime where the West Bank is carved up into small impoverished Bantustans as result of the Wall, Israeli settlements, annexation of the Jordan Valley, and settler-only highways. The aim, many believe, is to ensure that no viable Palestinian state is possible.
Why
Should This Conflict Matter To Us?
Jeff Halper highlights this question. His answer: “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is more than merely a local war between two peoples. Seldom has a conflict lasted as long – a century since the Zionist movement began acquiring land in Palestine; eighty years of actual conflict; almost sixty years of Israeli independence and Palestinian ‘catastrophe’; forty years of occupation – and seldom has a conflict had such a destabilizing effect on the international system. For the entire Muslim world the conflict represents ‘the clash of civilisations’ from a Muslim perspective: it is Western neo-colonialism, American Empire and the humiliation of Arabs and Islam in a microcosm. It is inconceivable that any meaningful accommodation between the West and Islam can proceed without this conflict being resolved.
For anyone concerned with building a world based on inclusion, equality, human rights, international law, justice, peace and development, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must arouse great trepidation. For here, the forces of power, militarism, realpolitik and domination are asserting their right to determine the ‘World Order’. If on the southern border of Europe, in the light of day, an Occupation actually wins and an entire people, the Palestinian people, is literally imprisoned behind 26 foot high concrete walls, if a new apartheid regime is imposed in the Holy land of all places, then what hope is there for the oppressed and downtrodden in other parts of the world less noticed by the media? . . . . . . . We all have a stake in defeating occupation and ensuring a just peace based on human rights and international law. Lose here and the prospects for a better world are dimmed significantly.”
War on Want have produced an excellent
report called ‘Profiting from the Occupation’ which can be obtained free from
their office T 020 7549 0555
and E mailroom@waronwant.org and there is more information on their
website www.waronwant.org or contact
Mary T 020 8892 3271 and E justicemh@talk21.com
for an action sheet.
This is quite a one sided account. I
apologise for any inaccuracies. It would be interesting to have other views.
Mary Holmes
July 2006